2019 Pre-Conference Professional Development Workshops

2019 Pre-Conference Professional Development Workshops

SBCA 2019 Annual Conference

Thinking About the Width and Breadth of Benefit-Cost Analysis


Wednesday, March 13, 2019

SBCA will once again offer pre-conference professional development workshops on the day before the annual conference begins.

The workshop Registration will be open soon! Please check here for updates. 

Workshop registration includes break refreshments, along with a networking reception on Wednesday evening following the afternoon workshops. Individuals registered for both a morning and an afternoon workshop are also provided lunch. Fees are used in part to cover the cost of food and beverages for the activities mentioned above. 

Venue: The Marvin Center at the George Washington University 

800 21st St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20052

SBCA will be offering the following pre-conference professional development workshops:

1. Putting Benefit Cost Analysis into Practice: Creating a Criminal Justice BCA Model

2. A Voice Crying in the Wilderness? Techniques for Promoting the Use of Evidence and BCA Results to Policymakers

3. Using Meta-Analysis to Support Benefit-Cost Analysis and Evidence-Based Policymaking

A description of each workshop, including the preliminary agenda and list of instructors, as well as the registration fees, is provided below.

Putting Benefit Cost Analysis into Practice: Creating a Criminal Justice BCA Model

Organizer: Michael Wilson, MWConsulting


Policy makers often decide where to invest limited tax revenues without having a way to estimate the expected return on that investment. Benefit-cost analysis, however, can provide policy makers with an estimate of the benefits of investing in a given program or policy. This seminar will provide a step-by-step description of the methodology used to create a benefit-cost model for programs and policies designed to reduce crime. We will discuss how to estimate tax payer and victimization costs of crime, and also how to use an effect size of a program to determine the estimated number of crimes avoided and the estimated benefit of avoiding them.

This seminar is designed to be very practical, giving analysts the resources to understand and develop their own benefit-cost models. The workshop is designed for analysts with beginner to intermediate level experience in the field of criminal justice policy analysis.

Preliminary Agenda (Subject to Change)

1:30 – 1:45 Overview of workshop and learning objectives
1:45 – 2:15 Theory and concepts of economic evaluation of criminal justice programs
2:15 – 3:00 Estimating crime and recidivism rates
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 3:45 Monetary valuation of crime and victimization
3:45 – 4:15 Calculating cash flows
4:15 – 4:45 Sensitivity testing
4:45 – 5:00 Wrap up and adjourn


Register Here!

A Voice Crying in the Wilderness? Techniques for Promoting the Use of Evidence and BCA Results to Policymakers

Organizer: Steven Lize, The Pew Charitable Trusts

Additional Presenters: Gary VanLandingham, The Florida State University; Nick Hart, Bipartisan Policy Center


There are increasing calls for government officials to use benefit-cost analysis (BCA) and related forms of evidence to inform budget and policy decisions. Yet, as the intended consumers of BCA, policymakers are typically unfamiliar with the concepts, assumptions, and methods used to carry out these studies, which can cause confusion and/or dismissal of findings. It is thus critical for analysts to know how to present BCA findings and related evidence in a clear and convincing manner. It is also vital for analysts to build effective long-term relationships to gain the trust of policymakers, and to help them devise policy levers that promote the ongoing use of BCA results and related evidence into the policy process. 

This workshop will train participants on ways to effectively bring BCA results and related evidence to government officials in the fast-paced policy process and to help build a culture of evidence use within the executive and legislative branches. The presenters bring decades of experience working with public leaders and their key staff as well as best practices gained from working with federal, state, and local governments to promote evidence-based policymaking. 

The topics will include effective modes of communicating complex findings to policymakers through presentations, reports, in-person briefings, and social media. It also includes effective approaches for building partnerships with policymakers and their key staff to gain the confidence and support of these key stakeholders, and discussion of proven mechanisms for promoting the use of BCA and rigorous evidence in the policy and budget processes. This half-day workshop includes a mixture of lecture-style presentation, discussion, and hands-on problem solving. Participants are encouraged to bring samples of their work as well as practical questions to collaborate on with the facilitators.

Preliminary Agenda (Subject to Change)

8:30 - 9:00 Overview of workshop and learning objectives
9:00 - 9:45 Understanding the policymaking context
9:45 - 10:15 Analytical tools for showing the bottom line
10:15 - 10:30 Break 
10:30 - 11:15 Techniques for communicating economic analyses and related evidence
11:15 - 12:00 Helping policymakers create a culture of producing and evidence 
12:00 - 12:30 Conclusion & review


Register Here!

Using meta-analysis to support benefit-cost analysis and evidence-based policymaking

Organizer: Michael Hirsch, Washington State Institute for Public Policy

Additional Presenter: Eva Westley, Washington State Institute for Public Policy


Government interest in using benefit-cost analysis (BCA) to inform budget and policy decisions has grown in recent years. A fundamental challenge in conducting these analyses is the need to predict the outcomes of the programs and policies under review. The practical, policy-ready creation of a benefit-cost analysis based on literature requires a coordinated meta-analysis and the consideration of other factors.

The Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP) is a recognized national leader in meta-analysis and benefit-cost modeling, and it has developed rigorous methods in these fields that can be a valuable resource to other organizations. This workshop will cover the WSIPP process for determining changes in quantity of relevant public policy outcomes reported in high-quality program evaluations and research. This training will cover topic selection, literature reviews, effect size calculation, meta-regression, and the practical steps to use an effect-size measurement in a benefit-cost analysis. Participants will be guided through case studies of the WSIPP process and leave with excel workbooks and the knowledge to calculate common effect size transformations and perform meta-analysis aimed at applying to benefit-cost analysis.

Preliminary Agenda (Subject to Change)

8:30 - 8:45: WSIPP intro / Why conduct this work. Why is this something of interest? A discussion of WSIPP's legislative direction and the ways in which the stakeholder determines the questions
8:45 - 9:30: What does it mean to look at a program? We will cover the scoping of topics, literature reviews, coding studies for meta-analysis, and classification of topics and outcomes
9:30 - 11:00: How Much? Effect Sizes and Meta- Analysis. Ideas covered will include an examination of WSIPP techniques to aggregate research using the 'Effect Size' in the context of meta-analysis
11:00 - 11:15: Break
11:15 - 12:00 - Practical implementation of effect size calculations. We will then look at the practical application of the effect size including issues of meta-regression, the context in which the program is implemented, who gets, the program, and how long do the effects last.
12:00 - 12:30: Using effect sizes in benefit-cost analysis. The concluding unit introduces ways that effect sizes are used to estimate unit changes in quantities that may be monetized in benefit-cost analysis. We will provide a framework for translating effect size unit changes into monetary impacts across a range of policy outcomes.


Register Here!

Deregulatory Benefit-Cost Analysis

Organizer: Jennifer Baxter, Industrial Economics, Incorporated

Addititional Presenters: Elizabeth Ashley, U.S. Office of Management and Budget; Dallas Burtraw, Resources for the Future; Jerry Ellig, George Washington Regulatory Studies Center; Amber Jessup, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services


While benefit-cost analysis (BCA) is a well-established component of the regulatory development process, it is generally conducted in the context of regulations imposing new constraints on regulated entities. Analysis of agency actions offering regulatory relief is less commonly undertaken, however, such analysis is likely to be used more frequently in the future as a key tool in the implementation of Executive Order 13771. BCA of deregulatory actions may involve retrospective analysis to identify candidates for repeal or revision, as well as prospective analysis of the likely cost savings or forgone benefits resulting from proposed regulatory changes.

These analyses pose difficult challenges related to predicting what is likely to occur if existing requirements remain in force and likely responses to deregulation. For example, costs of existing regulations may be sunk or fixed in the near-term or longer-run, affecting decisions about how to respond to deregulatory actions. Similarly, changes in cultural norms and attitudes might affect responses to deregulation.  Additionally, technological progress and related changes in risks can be difficult to forecast.

This workshop brings together leading experts and practitioners with diverse perspectives to discuss these challenges. It is targeted to both those interested in conducting these analyses and those interested in better understanding the strengths and limitations of analyses they review. Prior to the workshop, participants will receive a list of optional readings. The workshop itself will consist of a series of presentations, including case studies, with ample time for discussion. There are no prerequisites or requirements for participation.

Preliminary Agenda (Subject to Change)

1:30 - 1:40 Introduction (Jennifer Baxter, Industrial Economics, Incorporated)
1:40 - 2:20 Executive Order 13771 and Legal Requirements Related to Deregulatory Actions\
2:20 - 3:00 OMB Guidance on Deregulatoy Analysis (Dr. Elizabeth Ashley, OMB OIRA)
3:00 - 3:15 Break
3:15 - 3:45 Case Study #1: EPA's Replacement of the Clean Power Plan (Dr. Dallas Burtraw, Resources for the Future)
3:45 - 4:15 Case Study #2: FCC's Repeal and Replacement of the Net Neutrality Rules (Dr. Jerry Ellig, The George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center)
4:15 - 4:45 General Lessons Learned: An Agency Perspective (Dr. Amber Jessup, U.S. Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation)
4:45 - 5:00 Wrap-up (Jennifer Baxter)


Register Here!


Please contact SBCA at info@benefitcostanalysis.org

2019 Workshop Subcommittee

  • Steven Lize, Chair (Pew Charitable Trusts)
  • Jennifer Baxter (Industrial Economics, Inc.)
  • Cristina McLaughlin (U.S. Food & Drug Administration)
  • Clark Nardinelli (U.S. Food & Drug Administration)
  • Lisa Robinson (Harvard University)
  • Stuart Shapiro (Rutgers University)